
Photo courtesy http://www.flickr.com/photos/celesterc/.
On Labor Day (United States), I went with a friend to Goodwill. She wanted to take advantage of the store’s sale on clothes and I was just going along for the ride. I need to lose about forty pounds before I even think about buying new clothes. But a welcome surprised when we arrived was that there was also a sale on books, most of which were no more than three or four dollars full price.
One of the books I left with was Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books. I’d been interested for several years in reading that particular book, but hadn’t gotten around to it. Since it was such a good price, of course I snatched it up, along with four others.
If you read the back of Reading Lolita, the publisher describes it as being about a woman who holds what basically amounts to a book discussion group in her Tehran, Iran, apartment where the members (the former college professor’s students) read books that the Iranian government has banned. Obviously, one such book is Lolita.
By that description, the book most definitely sounds interesting. But the description is misleading. Yes, this book group is a part of the book. In fact, it takes up the entire first section. But there is so much more to it.
For those less familiar with Reading Lolita, the author is a woman who received a literature degree in the United States and then returned to her native country in 1979, just as Ayatollah Khomeini and his, shall we say minions?, seize control of Iran from the Shah. I’m more than half way through the memoir and the majority of it is about the author’s experiences during and after the revolution and of course throughout the course of the Iraq/Iran war of the 1980s. Her life touches those of her students and she tells what she knows of their experiences, as well.
What this book is, really, is a personal history lesson about an extremely tumultuous time in history that changed the world and I’m learning so much more than I ever did in school.
In reading Reading Lolita, I began thinking about how publishers so often drop the ball in promoting books. I suppose in a way, what they’re doing is working, since the books I’m talking about have been best-sellers. But I wonder at the same time, what am I missing out on?
I’ll begin with Harry Potter. I didn’t read a single word of any of the books until last July and then I devoured all seven of them in sixteen days and re-read them all within the next year. But I only did so because I happened to catch a couple of the movies on television. The impression I had of the books, based solely on the publicity they received, was that they were very juvenile and a bit silly and while others may have loved them, I didn’t think they were for me.
The next book I nearly missed — and didn’t thanks to a movie preview — was The Help. Everyone raved about it. I thought I should give it a go. Then I walked into Borders, picked it up and read the cover. It said something about a young southern girl looking for her missing nanny and learning lessons along the way. I immediately put it down. I only bought it after seeing a preview for the movie (which I hated) and realizing there was much more to it.
Once I’d read The Help, it became clear just how ridiculous the description was on the back cover. Was Skeeter, the heroine, looking for her missing nanny? Well, yes. But that was mostly a subplot that took a back seat to her stealthily interviewing black housekeepers in Alabama at the beginning of the Civil Rights movement in order to publish a book exposing the truth about what went on behind the manicured lawns.
That was an excellent book. The one described is sentimental and hackneyed.
I wonder if it’s always been this way. I don’t think it has. I’ve been a reader my entire life. I don’t recall a time I wasn’t. I’ve always chosen books at random. I walk into a book store or library and a title catches my eye. I read the back of the book or the inside jacket if it’s hardcover and if it interests me, I take it home and either love it or hate it. This method has worked well for me for thirty-five years. And now? Not so much.
Now I walk into a store and look at the books and they all sound awful. And many of them are. And now I can’t even count on the publishers to help me figure out which is which.
I have over time (and I’ve had a lot more reading time in life than you!) found that the more a book is praised the more disappointed I can end up being in them.
Sometimes I have thought to myself-perhaps I am a “book snob” maybe I am secretly thinking all other book readers are “below me” (I promise-I hate “snobs” or anyone who thinks they are better than anyone else no matter on what basis and do not want to ever be one so therefore try to suppress any thoughts in that direction!) Maybe whiile reading the books I am instead sub-consciously searching for why it is Not “all that”.
However, having been involved in a book club for over 5 years with a semi-stable group I have come to the realization that love for a work of literature is extremely personal. A great book has to end up impacting you and your thoughts somehow.
There are so many people I have known that I am totally in sync with about most books-but there has never been (and I hope there never will be!) anyone else who has ever totally loved every book that I have totally loved and vis versa.
There have been many, many books that everyone within my group all agree is a great book. This does not happen often within my group but best books to me though have been the ones that either only “I” love or the books that only “I” dislike.
Well, my issue isn’t really with books receiving high praise. It’s that the descriptions given by the publishers on the backs of the books are not very good. I expected, based solely on the back of the book, The Help and Reading Lolita to be very different books than they turned out to be.
The fact that “everyone” loves a particular book may inspire me to check and see if it looks like something I’m interested in, but I won’t read something that doesn’t look interesting to me. It annoys me because I think I’m probably missing out on books I might love because the publishers do such a lousy job in description.
As for being a literature snob, well, I admit I am and I’m not sorry. That doesn’t mean that everyone has to love every book I do or that if I don’t like a book that it is automatically a bad book. I mean, I could NOT get into The HUnger Games, but I can admit that the writing was good and that plot and themes are deep and interesting. So, while it wasn’t for me, I think the series is good — on an objective level. But then you have things like the 50 Shades books. On an objective level, they are bad. The writing is worse than poor, the plot barely exists — it’s just something to throw in to up the word count between sex scenes and means nothing — and the theme is that if you let a psychopath beat you, he’ll fall in love with you and it’s great because he’s rich and “hot.” Those are bad books. I don’t think they should have been published and I think it brings shame to the world of serious publishing that it was.
Well, you have a right to be a “literature snob” it’s your “thing”.
Guess, I kinda missed what your “issue” was with it (being the description) and went ahead on my own issue! LOL!
I’ve noticed this a LOT with John Grisham novels. Most of his books are NOT legal thrillers, but that’s what he’s known for, so the publishers market them that way. So when they turn out not to be thrillers, readers are disappointed and say the books aren’t good. Some of his non-thrillers are VERY good, but I can totally understand why someone would be disappointed when they go in expecting one thing and end up with something completely different.
Honestly, I don’t know why they don’t just say what it is! There are so many books I wonder if I missed out on because of that. I would never have read The Help if I hadn’t seen the movie trailer. I would have read Reading Lolita, anyway, but I probably would have read it sooner.
I think your post put my thoughts into words.
I choose books by the cover; I’m not proud of that ignorant approach of mine, yet it doesn’t often dissapoint me.
One book that I never remember reading in high school, (although I probably was assigned to read it), was To Kill a Mockingbird.
That was a misleading title; I know I never even peeked at the publishers description on the jacket. I did, however read and enjoy the book some 30+ years after it was ‘assigned’. It is now my favorite read and re-read…